Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Two Approaches to Dialectical Argumentation: Admissible Sets and Argumentation Stages
Currently there is a revival of the study of dialectical argumentation in the artificial intelligence community. There are good reasons why: First, the notions of argument and counterargument shed new light on nonmonotonic reasoning. Second, the process character of dialectical argumentation inspires new computational techniques. In a recent important paper, Dung [1] has studied the relations o...
متن کاملAn Approach to Argumentation Schemes that Appeal to Expert Opinion
Argumentation is a form of reasoning that deeply resembles the human mechanism for commonsense reasoning. An argumentation scheme is a representational tool for modeling common patterns of reasoning; in particular, it displays the form of an argument by showing how the argument is built using the inferential structures commonly used in everyday discourse. Argument schemes are very useful in con...
متن کاملImplementing Argumentation Schemes as Logic Programs
The dominant approach to argumentation mining has been to treat it as a text classification problem. However some applications to scientific text, such as accurately summarizing argumentation in research articles, require a deeper understanding of the text. This paper provides a novel approach in which argumentation schemes are represented as logic program rules for use in argumentation mining....
متن کاملChance Discovery Using Dialectical Argumentation
The authors propose the use of a dialectical argumentation formalism for chance discovery in domains where knowledge is distributed across a number of distinct knowledge-bases, as in a system of autonomous software agents. Each agent may have only a partial view of a problem, and may have insufficient knowledge to prove particular hypotheses; our formalism provides a means to aggregate across t...
متن کاملAutomated Workflows using Dialectical Argumentation
This paper presents a framework for dynamic workflow creation and execution developed as part of ARGUGRID, a collaborative project that seeks to provide a new model for programming the Grid at a semantic, knowledge-based level of abstraction through the use of argumentative agent technology. In this framework, workflow selection is coordinated by agent interactions based upon a dialogue game th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Artificial Intelligence and Law
سال: 2003
ISSN: 0924-8463
DOI: 10.1023/b:arti.0000046008.49443.36